Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 13:27
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why do some people believe that Homelander would be no match for Superman or Thor?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
New Report Ranks 3 New Jersey Towns Among Kindest In America - 92.7 WOBM
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
How conservative the Japanese people really is? And the government?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Do you have any fantasies you are ashamed of?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
To prevent ovarian cancers, fallopian tube removal is on the rise - statnews.com
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.